{"id":900,"date":"2026-02-17T14:24:53","date_gmt":"2026-02-17T14:24:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.curtin.edu.au\/assessment2030\/training-packages-2\/"},"modified":"2026-03-30T08:31:18","modified_gmt":"2026-03-30T08:31:18","slug":"marking-written-submissions-in-age-of-genai","status":"publish","type":"page","link":"https:\/\/www.curtin.edu.au\/assessment2030\/training-packages\/marking-written-submissions-in-age-of-genai\/","title":{"rendered":"Marking Written Submissions in Age of GenAI"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

You have just finished marking a batch of non-secure Lane 2 assessments. The averages were much better than previous years, with most quite well-written, structurally sound, and surprisingly polished. But a thought lingers: did the students actually learn anything, or are you just marking AI-generated work?<\/p>\n\n\n\n

You are not alone. Across the sector, educators are discovering that non-secure Lane 2 assessments demand more deliberate and specific design and marking to surface genuine learning. This workshop takes you through assessing and marking written assessments where GenAI is allowed!<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Duration: <\/strong>90 minutes
Format: <\/strong>interactive, hands-on, in-person
Group size: <\/strong>Up to 30 participants
Bring along: <\/strong>a current Lane 2 assessment task and rubric
Facilitator:<\/strong> Raelene Tifflin

The workshop is built around three learning signals that indicate whether a student has engaged with the learning materials. You will explore each signal through real examples, then apply what you have learned to explore how to mark Lane 2 written assessment tasks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n